James LePore: The Myth of Naming in Fiction

Inside Look Comments (2)


LePore Author Photo

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
Romeo and Juliet (II,ii, 1-2)

My Basic Premise
There are no ideas or emotions unless first there is a human being (Character 1) who thinks something or feels something. That human being cannot exist of course without context, that is, time and place. Character 1 must be placed in the world (or a world if you’re writing fantasy or sci-fi) at some point in time as we know it. Action does not necessarily follow. Another human being (Character 2) must first be added to the context, someone present, past or future, who has done or said something that motivates Character 1 to act.

What I Do
I start with a name. I know this sounds crazy, but getting the right name for my central character somehow triggers the mysterious process of writing a novel or a story. I suppose that starting with a place, like a medieval castle or a colony on Mars, would work as well, but you will quickly need a person, a person who feels and thinks. That person will have to have a name. The story, for me, is in the name.

Let’s say Character 1 is Jane Scardino. The first thing that comes to mind is that her friends call her Scar. Does she have a scar somewhere on her body? Maybe. Will it be integral to her story? Maybe. Does she like her name? Is she Italian? I digress, but perhaps you see what I mean.

What does Jane look like? Is she young, old, beautiful? What is she wearing? Let’s say she’s in her mid-forties, worrying about her fading beauty and not happy to be so vain. She’s wearing something comfortable, but fashionable, yes, attractive, a black high-collared sweater, black slacks, funky shoes decorated with faux gems and sparkling rhinestone (or are they diamond?) earrings. Vanity wins, it seems.

What is Jane doing? Perhaps she’s getting ready for work, putting those earrings on, thinking about her mother’s boyfriend, who she’s worried is stealing her mother’s money. Yesterday she saw her mom going into the bank with Harry, her charming, silver-haired, Cadillac-driving beau. Jane is going to see a lawyer after work to talk about this, a lawyer she met at work last week who asked her out. She had declined, but why then did she pick him?

I think I might have the beginning of a story here, a story that started with a name, a name that somehow has a story in it.

Shakespeare was talking about things, not people. The names of things are not their essence. But could Romeo Montague and Juliette Capulet have gone down in history as John and Jane Smith? We’ll never know, but something tells me the answer is no.

James LePore’s most recent novel is Gods and Fathers. You can read more about him here.

Pin It

» Inside Look » James LePore: The Myth of...
On December 19, 2012
By
, , , , , , ,

2 Responses to James LePore: The Myth of Naming in Fiction

  1. As a science fiction or fantasy writer, I usually start with a concept. I saw the documentary “Mysterious Castles of Clay” many years ago and thought, Wow, African fungus-growing termites would make a great candidate for evolving into an intelligent lifeform on another planet. A long time later, “The Termite Queen” was the result. But it’s true – you can’t write a story without characters. The first line in the book is “My name is Ti’shra.” It’s a giant Worker termite who has been abducted by aliens (humans) and it dying alone on an unknown planet (Earth). And I have found that once I name a character, even a minor one, I’m stuck. That darn character takes on a life of its own! It develops a backstory, opinions, current activities, a future – I have to be very careful, or it can take over and lead me into places no author dares to go!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« »